Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Stock Synopsis
 The Equity Desk Forum :Investment Ideas - Creating winning portfolios! :Stock Synopsis
Message Icon Topic: HOV SERVICES Post Reply Post New Topic
Page  of 8 Next >>
Author Message
hit2710
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Jun/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4013
Quote hit2710 Replybullet Topic: HOV SERVICES
    Posted: 04/Aug/2010 at 10:03pm

HOV SERVICES  cmp 92

HOVS is one of the largest end-to-end BPO companies, providing healthcare, finance and accounting, e-content management, document lifecycle, presentment, HR assist, and strategic consulting services across key verticals such as BFSI, Healthcare, Government, Telco, Publishing, Retail, Commercial and Industrial Manufacturing industries.

 

The motto of the company is “Exceed Expectations”.

                                                              

True to the word, the company exceeded expectations of shareholders on the downside in terms of share price.

 

Reason: It sold of its stake in various subsidiaries namely 100% Stake in Bay Area Credit Services, 100% interest in HOV AR Management Services, and 30% minority stake in TRAC Holdings to Rustic Canyon for a consideration of 12 Million usd.  In doing so the company effectively booked exceptional loss of 132 crores and hence reported a loss at net level in FY 10.

 

FINANCIALS

 

After all this mess clean-up, the company reported the following results for Q1 FY 11.

 

Sales    182 cr   vs 223 cr (decline in revenues is due to divestment of subsidiaries)

NP        17.64 cr  vs  12.27 cr  ( improvement in margins is evident)

Interest payment has reduced from 9.41 cr to 7.36 cr.

 

Quarterly EPS  is at 14.13.

 

Total outstanding shares are at 1.25 cr and total market cap is at around 115 crores.

Debt as on march 2010 was around 520 crores which is expected to go down.

 

Dividend declared during fy 10 was Rs 4.

 

Promoter holding is around 49%-- no pledging  (around 9% shares were re classified as non promoter from promoter category—hence q-on q reduction in promoter shareholding)

 

Company bought back around 63000 shares at an avg price of 32 during buyback which finished in Jan 2010.

 

INVESTMENT THEME:

 

If one were to annualise the quarterly eps of 14, we get an annualised EPS of around 56.  So we are surprised why the stock is available at a pe of roughly 2 and market cap to sales of around 0.15?   And that is where the dilemma occurs.

 

Sometimes we are faced with a situation which is just “too good to be true”.   In such situations, one begins to wonder if there are skeletons hidden in the cupboard waiting to come out.  I tried hard to find out whether there are any significant negatives in this company.  Except debt and the write off, I couldn’t find too much.

 

Currency fluctuations could impact earnings.

 

Technically, after recent run up to 115 in April 2010 from a low of 24, the stock is currently consolidating  between 80-100 since 2 months.

 

If the company continues with its performance and maintains the first quarter results going forward for next few quarters, there could be some rerating and good gains.

 
DIVIDENDS:
 

Company paid Rs 2 interim dividend in fy 10 and declared another Rs 2 final div for which record date is 21 aug.  After declaring the q1 fy 11 results, another Rs 2 interim dividend is declared for fy 11 for which record date is not yet declared.

 

Now it needs to be seen if the “Exceed Expectations” theme applies to the company on upside.

 

Acknowledgement :  This scrip has been brought to my notice by a senior TEDDIE, master . thanks sir.

 
disc:  I have a holding in this company. 
Stockmarket is a weird place. For every person who buys a stock there is a person who sells it and both think they are very smart.
IP IP Logged
Jaishrikrishna
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/Sep/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1132
Quote Jaishrikrishna Replybullet Posted: 04/Aug/2010 at 10:11pm
Initially looks great, This has been a old reco. of RD, Lying low for a very long time, now since you have a position, i suppose, there will be instant, what i call it as "HIT EFFECT"
Don't Buy and Hold, Buy and Homework / Fish see the bait,but not the hook; Men see the profit, but not the peril.
IP IP Logged
hit2710
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Jun/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4013
Quote hit2710 Replybullet Posted: 04/Aug/2010 at 10:25pm


Here are some updates suggested by master.

1. Debt position as on June30 2010 is net bank debt of 100.3 million dollars which gives d/e ratio of 1.3

2. Comfortable liquidity with DSO of 52 days.

Financials need to be looked in view of its consolidated results. Most of websites display standalone results and here it might provide a wrong picture.


Stockmarket is a weird place. For every person who buys a stock there is a person who sells it and both think they are very smart.
IP IP Logged
master
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/May/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 831
Quote master Replybullet Posted: 04/Aug/2010 at 11:50pm

Now that Hit sir has done the hard work of setting up a thread & story, I will add a few points, mostly negative, in the interest of more informed decision-making by members:

  1. Promoters, in the past were involved with some firms in US, which ran into problems/legal disputes. To name a few, Bay Area Credit service, Interparm & Osicom .
  2. AR business arm which contributed about 17% to HOV's topline is gone, so revenue growth will have to be made up by other streams.
  3. EBIDTA margins of 17% and NPM of 9.6% is lower compared to few other companies in this space, probably because it's not into some of the high-end jobs.
  4. Q-o-q net profits declined by 10% in Q1-FY11.
  5. Business is not straightforward to understand, complex structure of subsidiaries, cross-country operations, forex issues etc.
  6. No brokerage report on this stock either side, at least I've not seen. (I'm calling this a negative since for a micro-cap, it can act as a basic information filter).
  7. No MF holding (I'm calling this a negative since it can be a hedge against unabated management action potentially).
  8. I feel markets would like to give this company a few more quarters to demonstrate its earnings record, before any re-rating is done.

 Disclosure – I'm invested here recently.

Someone’s sitting in shade today because someone planted a tree long time ago.
IP IP Logged
rapidriser
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18/Nov/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 966
Quote rapidriser Replybullet Posted: 04/Aug/2010 at 9:16am
Originally posted by hit2710

The motto of the company is “Exceed Expectations”.

                                                              

True to the word, the company exceeded expectations of shareholders on the downside in terms of share price.

 

 
 
LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL
When all else is lost, the future still remains. - Christian Nestell Bovée
IP IP Logged
genieinvestor
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 12/Sep/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Quote genieinvestor Replybullet Posted: 05/Aug/2010 at 3:54pm
Why is the Rediff data showing the EPS as Rs. 2.34 for March 2010 year???
IP IP Logged
hit2710
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Jun/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4013
Quote hit2710 Replybullet Posted: 05/Aug/2010 at 4:06pm
Originally posted by genieinvestor

Why is the Rediff data showing the EPS as Rs. 2.34 for March 2010 year???


You need to look at the consolidated figures. I mentioned earlier that most financial websites show standalone numbers. You can download results from bse or nse which give consolidated figures.
Stockmarket is a weird place. For every person who buys a stock there is a person who sells it and both think they are very smart.
IP IP Logged
nav_1996
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 08/Sep/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 803
Quote nav_1996 Replybullet Posted: 05/Aug/2010 at 7:36pm
I had researched this company when it was just around 60. I did not get answer to a key question.

Why would a company list in India when promoters are USA, customers are in USA and its manpower in in USA. Most probably because they could not meet SEC guidelines.

IP IP Logged
Page  of 8 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Bookmark this Page

Join Theequitydesk.com Today!

It’s easy to Join and it’s free.

Here's why members would love to be a part of theequitydesk.com

  • Equity Desk focuses on why to buy shares and invest in share rather than what to buy.
  • Live discussion forum wherein members can discuss the current Indian share Market trend, BSE Sensex or the Nifty Index.
  • Have huge cache of information on Indian and World Share Market.
  • Analysis of Indian stock market, Global events, Investing insights, portfolio management strategies and thoughts,
  • Meet investors from round the globe check their investing strategies share experiences and learn for their experiences on stocks and shares, evaluate opinions on investing in India.

Register now while it’s free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us           Close