Originally posted by datta.supratik
Basantji,What do you exactly mean by free cash flow? How do we calculate that from balance sheet. Is it cash and cash equivalents end of the year? And I hope that a part of this will be distributed right?~Supratik
|
Free cash flow could be calculated as:
EBIT*(1-t) + Depreciation - Change in Working Capital - Capex
you should be able to find EBIT, t (tax rate), depreciation in the income statement
working capital is defined as current assets - current liabilities, both of which could be found in balance sheet. since, we are interested in change in working capital, you will have to take the data for both the years, current year and the previous year.
capex could be taken from the balance sheet or from investing cash flows.
Please note this will give you free cash flow to the firm, which when discounted at WACC will give you Enterprise Value. This is related to Equity value as:
Enterprise value = Equity value + Net debt (which is essentially Debt - Cash)
To calculate free cash flow to equity, you will have to add new debt and subtract debt repayment from free cash flow to the firm. Free cash flow to equity when discounted at Re will give you Equity value.
Now, while a firm may show an increase in profits consistently, it is of a little value to its shareholders if the free cash flows are not going up or if there is no free cash at all or negative free cash flows

(doesn't happen with good companies, but not uncommon with companies that go burst). But please note, free cash flows could be low/negative because of several reasons (various combinations of the components which are used for calculating free cash flows). So, one may try to fool the investors with P&L, but one cannot fool investors with free cash flows. EBITDA has similar characteristics, because it stays away from the effects of capital structure (% of debt and equity, thus different interest income and thus different profit) and depreciation & amortization (which at times could be arbitrary). That's one of the main reasons why PE investors (or those who think along the same lines) give so much of importance to DCF (discounted cash flows) or EBITDA.
Another thing: One of the main drawbacks of using tools such as RoCE and RoE is that they measure return against the book value of assets in the business, which when depreciated might continue to give high(er) RoCE/RoE even though cash flows could tell a different story. In the process, older businesses (something like Hawkins I assume) with depreciated assets are likely to have higher RoCE than newer, possibly better businesses. Cash flows are affected by inflation and take latest values into consideration, but the book value (of assets) does not, and hence cash flows provide a clearer picture about the company.
Edited by rkgautam - 24/Aug/2011 at 12:21pm