Joined: 02/Sep/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9319
Posted: 03/Apr/2008 at 7:44am
The Little
Book that Builds Wealth is all about one principle - determining
a company's economic moat. This is an important concept, as a moat protects a company's profits from
competition and allows the company to earn exceptional returns on capital over
long periods of time.
Businesses
that earn high returns on capital invariably attract lots of competition.
Companies with no moat can see their profit margins and sales growth dwindle as
competitors capture more and more of their market share. On the other
hand, wide moat companies have
advantages that make it very difficult or uneconomical for competitors to try
and compete with them. The concept of a moat has been one of the keys
behind the success of the world's most recognized investor, Warren Buffett.
Dorsey lays
out 4 main ways a company can establish
an economic moat (or durable competitive advantage, as Buffett would
say).
The first
method is by intangible assets.
Examples of this are a strong brand that
allows a business to charge more for comparable items, patent protection on products like drug formulations and
technologies, and regulatory licenses that are particularly hard to obtain.
The second
method is by having high switching costs
- the "sticky" customer advantage. Here, Dorsey presents
banks and widely adopted software vendors as having high switching costs.
Who wants to go through the hassle of transferring an account or training an
entire staff on a new piece of software?
The third
form of a moat is created by the network
effect, where the value of a business increases with each node on the
network. This very powerful advantage is well illustrated by credit card
processors.
The last way
to create a moat is through cost
advantages. There are a number of ways companies can accomplish
this. One way (although the least durable) is by simply having a better business model than your competition. The
second, and more durable, method of cost advantage is by having a better location than your
competition.
Nearly as
useful as the discussion of what constitutes a moat is the explanation of what DOES NOT constitute a moat.
How many times have you seen a company recommended because of a great new product or a successful manager
that is hired to turn the company around? These are not durable advantages.
Book review: The Little
Book that Builds Wealth, by Morningstar's Director of Equity Research, Pat Dorsey.
Buffett once said of his long-term investment in Coca-Cola, which has been both a market darling and a market demon:
We have had depressions. We have had wars. Sugar
prices have gone up and down. A million things have happened. How much
more fruitful is it to think about whether the product is likely to
sustain itself and its economics than to try to be questioning whether
to jump in and out of the stock?
In other words, what he's after is a company with a strong competitive advantage -- a moat that lasts for years.
A nice protective ring of water Competitive
advantages are the sustainable factors or strategies that repel
competitors -- just like the ring of water around a medieval castle
fended off invaders. The better and more comprehensive this protection,
the longer the company can do what it does without worrying about
invaders on its turf.
According to Mark Sellers,
founder of Sellers Capital, there are four basic characteristics of a
strong, deep, and defensible moat. Let's look at them, briefly.
Economies of scale
Economies of scale
enable companies to produceproducts more cheaply than competitors --
effectively undercutting their prices. Think about Coke and Buffett's
comment about sugar prices. Sugar used to be the primary sweetener in
Coke. More recently, it's been corn syrup. Coke's global economies of
scale let it obtain that ingredient and distribute it at a cost that
makes its own product more profitable.
Intellectual property
But economies of
scale aren't the only thing Coke has going for it -- it also has a
world-famous brand. You might think brand is just name-recognition, but
it goes far beyond that. In fact, behavioral studies have shown that if
people know they are drinking a Coke, they say it tastes better than if
they receive the same drink in a blind taste test. That's powerful!
Intellectual property goes beyond brands, though, to include things like patents and trademarks.
Network effect
When the value of a product or service increases when more people use it, that's called a network effect.
High switching costs
If it will cost a
customer significant time and money to switch to a competitor's
product, the company is protected by those high switching costs.
In India, 'branded stocks' with these characteristics usually are fairly valued or over-priced.
Life can only be understood backwards—but it must be lived forwards
Buffett once said of his long-term investment in Coca-Cola, which has been both a market darling and a market demon:
We have had depressions. We have had wars. Sugar
prices have gone up and down. A million things have happened. <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">How much
more fruitful is it to think about whether the product is likely to
sustain itself and its economics </span>than to try to be questioning whether
to jump in and out of the stock?
In other words, what he's after is a company with a strong competitive advantage -- a moat that lasts for years.
A nice protective ring of waterCompetitive
advantages are the sustainable factors or strategies that repel
competitors -- just like the ring of water around a medieval castle
fended off invaders. The better and more comprehensive this protection,
the longer the company can do what it does without worrying about
invaders on its turf.
According to Mark Sellers,
founder of Sellers Capital, there are four basic characteristics of a
strong, deep, and defensible moat. Let's look at them, briefly.
Economies of scale
Economies of scale
enable companies to <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">produce</span> <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">products more cheaply than competitors</span> --
effectively undercutting their prices. Think about Coke and Buffett's
comment about sugar prices. Sugar used to be the primary sweetener in
Coke. More recently, it's been corn syrup. Coke's global economies of
scale let it obtain that ingredient and distribute it at a cost that
makes its own product more profitable.
Intellectual property
But economies of
scale aren't the only thing Coke has going for it -- it also has a<span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">
world-famous brand. You might think brand is just name-recognition, but
it goes far beyond that. </span>In fact, behavioral studies have shown that if
people know they are drinking a Coke, they say it tastes better than if
they receive the same drink in a blind taste test. That's powerful!
Intellectual property goes beyond brands, though, to <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">include things like patents and trademarks</span>.
Network effect
When the <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">value of a product or service increases when more people use it, that's called a network effect</span>.
High switching costs
If it will cost a
customer <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 153);">significant time and money to switch to a competitor's
product</span>, the company is protected by those high switching costs.
In India, 'branded stocks' with these characteristics usually are fairly valued or over-priced.
Even I've been reading a bit on competitive advantage.
But it's really difficult to figure out.
Could you tell us which branded Indian stocks are you talking about?
"History does not tell you the probability of future financial things happening" - Warren Buffett
The biggest branding takes place when the product is recommended by another company whose product is using that product.
An example is Tata Motors recommending use of Castrol GTD as lubricants for its passenger cars. Now if you are driving a Tata Indica, you wont try to figure out if anything's better than Castrol, and will like to go by Tata Motors recommendation.
Another example will be Colgate, which is hugely popular among the dentists community. Even a Pidilite fits that bill. I know it because I tried to do a brave act by trying to save some money and using another brand of adhesive and my carpenter simply refused to use that adhesive and I was forced to replace it with a Fevicol.
Joined: 07/Feb/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2827
Posted: 22/Nov/2008 at 11:34am
Originally posted by Vivek Sukhani
An example is Tata Motors recommending use of Castrol GTD as lubricants for its passenger cars. Now if you are driving a Tata Indica, you wont try to figure out if anything's better than Castrol, and will like to go by Tata Motors recommendation.
I don't know about other products. In the case of lubricants, TATA would be recommending Castrol not only because it is good product, but also because they are paid good royalty/commission of every litre of Castrol oil sold through their show rooms and service stations.
While they may do Castrol for the contracted period, it may be another oil company which pays them good money during next contract.
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)recommendation revenues are one of the good sources of money for the auto companies.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Here's why members would love to be a part of theequitydesk.com
Equity Desk focuses on why to buy shares and invest in share rather than what to buy.
Live discussion forum wherein members can discuss the current Indian share Market trend,
BSE Sensex or the Nifty Index.
Have huge cache of information on Indian and World Share Market.
Analysis of Indian stock market, Global events, Investing insights, portfolio
management strategies and thoughts,
Meet investors from round the globe check their investing strategies share experiences and learn
for their experiences on stocks and shares, evaluate opinions on investing in India.