while educomp went to great heights and settled down at 1850 levels.
i am an educationist and am skeptical on technology led education.
the arrangement with schools for TV screen fed education is not that convincing.
its more of  a fad.

good education happens between teacher and students directly.
tech can only be a enabler.
and educomps revenue sharing arrangements with schools is shaky.

content wise, they are no great shakes.
for schools , content is limited. it is not ROCKET SCIENCE.
its simple school education ie english, basic maths, history and some science.
content wise everonn , educomp etc are equal.

good and better content is available FREE on the net.
content is now a commodity.
not a good enough differentiator.

more no of schools on educomps list looks good on paper.
with cheaper alternatives coming up.
schools will walk away from them to a competitor.
here contracts are not having sanctity.
and enforcement is lenghty and painful.

i feel biz model of BOOT with govt is also doubtful and revenue collection is
tedious, payment delays are common. realisation time is long.
change in govt create issues.
moreover, govt schools do not have enough funding.

their online direct model thru mentoraide is almost non existent.

its more hype than substance.
private schools , in the long run will not be keen to share revnue with educomp for content related association.
this content is easily copied and does not enjoy copyright s as it is generic information , formatted and delivered.
no copyright can be availed for formatting and packaging.

we all need to do re check on educomp.
valuations of 3000 plus was ridiculous.
even at 1800 , it is not reasonable.