Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Emerging companies - Mid caps that can become large cap
 The Equity Desk Forum :Investment Ideas - Creating winning portfolios! :Emerging companies - Mid caps that can become large cap
Message Icon Topic: DFM Food Ltd-an Emerging FMCG backed by Westbridge Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 6 Next >>
Author Message
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 02/Apr/2014 at 2:12pm
DFM gets aggressive in taking on competition.......after Holi toys, launches CRAX Corn Rings with rechargeable glowing toys......will start promoting this attractive toy package with specific ads........marketing circles indicate more such initiatives from the brand mainly circling around innovation in free gifts with new ads for every novelty .....a nice strategy to retain and attract more of its target consumers.......

This initiative has coincided well with Prataap Snacks getting aggressive in Traditional Snacks (Namkeens) space and lowering its marketing concentration on YD Rings.

Rgds.
IP IP Logged
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 05/Apr/2014 at 2:43pm
My Q4FY14 & FY14 estimates for DFM Foods :
 
 



( fig. in Rs. cr. )

Q4FY14e

Q4FY13




Revenue

6168

56.87




EBITDA

5.35.8

5.03




PAT

1.31.8

1.06








( fig. in Rs. cr. )

FY14e

FY13




Revenue

261268

225.24




EBITDA

23.423.9

21.21




PAT

7.88.3

6.31



 

IP IP Logged
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 15/Apr/2014 at 11:45am

Bikaji Foods PE-deal details out.....The valuation part of the deal is noteworthy as it is much higher than earlier reported and the stake dilution is almost half than earlier reported in press......

Majumdar & Partners acted as advisors for the deal where Lighthouse has picked up 12.5 % equity stake in Bikaji for INR 90 cr.....Bikaji (FY13 Revenues = 325.50 cr. & EBITDA = 24.39 cr.) is valued at an EV of INR 739 cr. much higher than previously anticipated of 499 cr.

Valuation multiples at which deal is stuck :

EV/Sales (TTM) = 2.27

EV/EBITDA (TTM) = 30.29

 

just to draw a comparison :

3 Years' CAGR in Sales of Bikaji is 28.39 %  v/s  DFM's 3 Years' CAGR in Sales at 46.13 %

3 Years' CAGR in EBITDA of Bikaji is 35.01 %  v/s  DFM's 3 Years' CAGR in EBITDA at 40.31 %

4 Years' Average EBITDA Margin of Bikaji is 7.39 % v/s DFM's 4 Years' Average EBITDA Margin at 11.94 %.

Contribution of Savoury Snacks to FY13 Revenues of Bikaji is 89 %  v/s  Contribution of Savoury Snacks to FY13 Revenues of DFM at 100 %

 

 

Seems Westbridge has stuck a good deal in DFM (@ TTM - EV/Sales = 1.41 & EV/EBITDA = 13.32) and could very well fetch good returns from it. The Bikaji-Lighthouse deal seems to be a comforting news for DFM shareholders.

Rgds.

IP IP Logged
Arshavin23
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 01/Oct/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Quote Arshavin23 Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2014 at 9:01pm
Mahesh,

Should we not compare the debt levels of both companies to get a better perspective on the valuation multiples? Do you have any info on Bikaji's debt-equity ratio?

I am also analyzing DFMs expansion strategy and have a few points to make...

1. They are simultaneously expanding in the eastern as well as the western part of the country.

2. For a product such as Crax which has a very low value to weight ratio (Rs 5 pack for 17 grams), the farther the consumers are from the manufacturing plant, the higher will be the transportation costs and growth will be at lower margins.

3. Is it not better for the company to expand by taking on one territory at a time? Had they expanded only in the west or east, would they not have experienced some economies of scale? A denser distribution network in one territory would have led to reduced transportation costs as well as lesser overheads when compared to expanding in two territories that are geographically apart.

Let me have your thoughts.

Rgds.
IP IP Logged
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 17/Apr/2014 at 12:21pm
Some facts about Bikaji Foods :

 
--Business Model of Bikaji revolves around Traditional Snacks business with 77 % of FY13 revenues coming from sales of Bhujia & Namkeen.
 
--Rajasthan contributes 50 % of the sales turnover while exports contribute less than 1 % of FY13 revenues.


--Sales are primarily made via 400 distributors & C&F agents.


--Goods are sold on almost cash basis but its debtor level (FY13 = 7.98 cr.) is higher than that we have seen in DFM (DFM at 0.01 % of sales v/s Bikaji at 2.45 % of sales). This is because of the short credit period extended to few large distributors by Bikaji v/s having cash settlement system with almost all distributors by DFM.


--Asset Turnover of Bikaji as at FY13 is 3.74 whereas the same for FY12 was 3.06 and for FY11 it was 2.42 (in the range of 2.40-2.42 for FY10, FY09 & FY08)


--Meaningful Outsourcing of production is almost absent in all previous years (traded goods less than 0.2 % of sales) except in FY13 where it seems to have inched up to 0.86 % of sales.


--D/E for Bikaji as at FY13 is at 0.63.


--Bikaji has purchased land in RIICO Industrial Area and is looking at doubling its production capacity by FY16. Project cost is 100 cr. for which 90 cr. is raised from Lighthouse PE Fund by diluting 12.5 % equity stake. This is historically most substantial CAPEX being incurred by the company.


--Since FY09, Bikaji has also expanded into a sort of fast-food outlet format by setting up Food Junction in Malad, Mumbai. So far it has four such outlets in mumbai and two more planned to be opened in Andheri & Jaipur Airport. Its revenue from these outlets is not meaningful.

 

Feel free to get back to me in case of any further query.

Rgds. 
IP IP Logged
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 17/Apr/2014 at 1:42pm
Originally posted by Arshavin23

Mahesh,

Should we not compare the debt levels of both companies to get a better perspective on the valuation multiples? Do you have any info on Bikaji's debt-equity ratio?

I am also analyzing DFMs expansion strategy and have a few points to make...

1. They are simultaneously expanding in the eastern as well as the western part of the country.

2. For a product such as Crax which has a very low value to weight ratio (Rs 5 pack for 17 grams), the farther the consumers are from the manufacturing plant, the higher will be the transportation costs and growth will be at lower margins.

3. Is it not better for the company to expand by taking on one territory at a time? Had they expanded only in the west or east, would they not have experienced some economies of scale? A denser distribution network in one territory would have led to reduced transportation costs as well as lesser overheads when compared to expanding in two territories that are geographically apart.

Let me have your thoughts.

Rgds.
 
 
 
Hi Arshavin,
 
Have provided info on Bikaji's D/E ratio in my last post you can refer that.
 
On your points :
 
Yes...farther the manufacturing location higher will be the transportation costs.....this is the reason why you find 9MFY14 EBITDA margins under pressure as contribution from West and East has increased as % of sales.....
 
On was it better if co. would have expanded into one territory only and saturated the distribution presesnce there --- theoretically Yes but practically NO ----I will explain you why ---- when you enter a new territory, you have to face new challenges not only on taste front but also competition and personnel front.......so, if your goal is to expand aggressively you can't spend undue time in expanding and gauging response in that territory before expanding to other --- in such time business dynamics might change in the territory you left over to expand afterwards and you might face more difficulty in expanding there which was easier today.....
 
Now, to explain you specifically, DFM would most probably have a single manufacturing presence for serving both West & East India......So, it was logical for it to expand in both the territories at the same time --- Western market is having as larger scope as Northern India but there competitive intensity is far higher, especially in the form of Yellow Diamond -- Eastern market is relatively small but competitive intensity is relatively lower too --- channel checks suggest, CRAX has done relatively far better in Eastern Indian than Western India if we compare the same timeframe after launch --- but, that doesn't mean you can ignore one geography......
 
So far the company has done all right moves.....key monitorable will be company's sales & manufacturing expansion plans.....remember South is still out of the picture.....will be awaiting details on future CAPEX.
 
Rgds.
 
 
 
 
 
 
IP IP Logged
Arshavin23
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 01/Oct/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Quote Arshavin23 Replybullet Posted: 17/Apr/2014 at 11:49am
Thanks for the reply Mahesh,

They have the manufacturing infrastructure in place and now it's all about effective execution of their distribution and marketing strategy.
IP IP Logged
maheshishah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 07/Nov/2011
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 306
Quote maheshishah Replybullet Posted: 28/Apr/2014 at 11:53am

Packaged salty snacks topped FMCG sales in 2013: Report

By Ratna Bhushan, ET Bureau | 29 Apr, 2014, 04.00AM IST

 

NEW DELHI: Indians consumed more packaged salty snacks than any other fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) in 2013, as they emerged as the fastest growing grocery category, according to data compiled by researcher Nielsen. 

To drive growth in an otherwise uncertain consumption environment, snacks makers such as PepsiCo, ITC and Parle introduced low price points, stepped up distribution in smaller cities and towns and made their products to suit regional taste preferences. Others such as Haldiram, Balaji, Garden, Bikano, Yellow Diamond and DFM Foods' Crax, on the other hand, are playing on low price points, local flavours and quick turnaround time in churning out innovations. Snack sales are usually immune to seasonal fluctuations, which often affect beverages. 

"Conversion from loose to packaged, new formats, and convenient price points of Rs5 and Rs10 are key differentiators driving this category," said ITC Divisional chief executive (Foods) Chitranjan Dar. According to him, ITC's newer innovations under its flagship salty snack brands, Mad Angles and Tangles, have been key sales drivers. 

Salty snacks were the fourth fastest growing category in 2012, but last calendar year they topped all other fast-growing categories such as packaged rice and diapers. Pace of growth, however, slowed down from 29 per cent to 25 per cent over the past two years. That still was far quicker than the 9.4 per cent growth in 2013 sales posted by the overall FMCG sector, where the pace has slowed from the previous year's 18 per cent, according to Nielsen data. 


 

The salty snacks market was worthRs12,679 crore last year. A low-cost business compared with those like chips or biscuits, salty snacks operate on limited barriers to entry. Five of the top six fastest growing FMCG categories in 2013 were foods — snacks, chocolate, atta, non-refined oil and rice — all in excess of 20%. Popular items such as biscuits posted just 7 per cent growth, while detergent sales rose 10 per cent and soaps expanded 4 per cent. 

"Snacks isn't a me-too product... there's a value addition," said Shirish Pardeshi, executive director of investment banking as well as head of consumer and consumer services practice at Anand Rathi Advisors. PepsiCo, the market leader for salty snacks, had launched several local flavours under popular brand Kurkure. Chief executive Indra Nooyi projects about twothirds of PepsiCo's revenue growth to come from snack sales, driven by emerging markets. PepsiCo's senior director, foods marketing, Vidur Vyas said affordable indulgence and convenience were boosting growth in the category. 

"Traditional namkeens and localisation have been a crucial factor in driving category growth," said Parle Products group product manager BK Rao. Parle's first attempt to enter the category over three years back wasn't successful but it re-entered a year later and has met with good response, Rao said. The maker of Hide & Seek and Monaco biscuits sells namkeens under the brand Parle and FullToss. 

The unorganised snacks market remains undocumented, but industry players conversion from loose to branded is happening rapidly. Three years back, Pepsi-Co restructured its foods division to set up a mass-priced, low-cost traditional business model under its Lehar brand, mainly to fight off smaller brands. 

IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 6 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Bookmark this Page