Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Fundamental
 The Equity Desk Forum :Market Strategies :Fundamental
Message Icon Topic: Which Stock to Buy? A Quantitative Analysis Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 19 Next >>
Author Message
venkym2000
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 11/Oct/2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 53
Quote venkym2000 Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 9:18am
SmartCat Sir Fantabulous. Does PEG needs to be included as one of theparameter? Thanks, Venkat
IP IP Logged
basant
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Quote basant Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 9:25am
Originally posted by venkym2000

SmartCat Sir


Wow! Knighthood for SmartcatBig%20smile


'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
IP IP Logged
smartcat
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29/Mar/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4243
Quote smartcat Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 10:24am
I have a similar model on an Excel sheet which I use for buying stocks but unlike rankings I have a base number on which I set up points to the stock.
 
Basant, you know these 11 stocks better than anybody else. It would be interesting to know your ranking of these 11 stocks based on your parameters (including subjective factors like management pedigree & future prospects) at current market prices.  If it almost matches this quantitative mathematical model, then it would be amazing.
 
Your ranking should come out AFTER I'm done with the final 2 rounds (P/BV & Debt/Equity) though!

 
Try working with the RoE (1- payout ratio)
Does PEG needs to be included 
 
I don't think they matter much - because we are already considering RoE, div payout ratio, PE and growth rates.
 
This analysis apears to assume an equal weight on all the parameters considered . May I suggest we assign different weightage & see what a weighted sum throws up 
 
Interesting thought. I think this quantitative model is flexible enough to accomodate that because of simplicity of assigning points (descending order) and simplicity of final ranking (just adding up the scores).
 
Now let's say your portfolio does NOT have any asset rich companies (like manufacturing, power or chemicals) or financials. Then you don't need to care much about the stock's P/BV ratio. So if you want to, you can half the weightage of P/BV and assign 5.5 points for the stock with the highest P/BV and 0.5 to the one with the lowest. Or you can do away with P/BV compeletely.
 
And if you want to stress more on P/E, you can assign twice the weightage to it (22 points for lowest P/E and 2 points for the highest).
 
However, I do not recommend that - I recommend equal weightage. Remember that here, we are comparing stocks on various parameters across different sectors. We could be comparing the RoE of a financial stock with the RoE of a FMCG company. But in the end, the process of simple addition of scores cancels all these anomalies - in my opinion.
Wow! Knighthood for Smartcat
 
LORD.
 
I would like to addressed as Lord Smartcat.
 


Edited by smartcat - 15/Aug/2010 at 10:28am
IP IP Logged
vishal412
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10/Aug/2010
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Quote vishal412 Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 10:44am
Smartcat sir nice analysis about the stocks. I am a new investor and your analysis about these stocks are abosultly amazing.
Thanks
IP IP Logged
manish_okhade
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20/Oct/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1997
Quote manish_okhade Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 10:46am
So Hawkins scores high on all parameters. I would like to add one more qualitative strong factor which seems to be missing in all others in TED XI.
 
Hawkins is recession proof business due to its simple product of core necessity. Its true that if sensex crahes due to any external factor then Hawkins would be thrashed too in tendem. But recovery will be definitly fast and outstanding, such collapse often leds to cheap availability of RM and since demand for Hawkins is generic so with same growth rate Hawkins gives outstanding results in down time and it will sure lead to fast restoration of stock price.
IP IP Logged
p_pandekar
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 04/Mar/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Quote p_pandekar Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 11:05am
Great work Lord  SmartCat
IP IP Logged
basant
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Quote basant Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 11:20am
Originally posted by smartcat

 
Basant, you know these 11 stocks better than anybody else. It would be interesting to know your ranking of these 11 stocks based on your parameters (including subjective factors like management pedigree & future prospects) at current market prices.  If it almost matches this quantitative mathematical model, then it would be amazing.
 


Check PM.





Edited by basant - 15/Aug/2010 at 11:22am
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
IP IP Logged
somu0915
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Nov/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 703
Quote somu0915 Replybullet Posted: 15/Aug/2010 at 11:31am
Jahapanah..
Tussi great ho..
Tohfa kubul karo..
LOL
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 19 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.107 seconds.
Bookmark this Page