Why to ask someone else than to the person himself. I will tell you where else I have posted these reports and the reasons why I have posted them and if you feel I am suspicious then just tell me and I will never post on TED again. The person who has wrong in his heart has fear and guilt in his deeds.

Now, to answer your query, I have posted my reports on ********* ********************

Now, my reason for posting to various forums. When I started investing I used to visit various forums which I come across by somebody's reference or by word of mouth or via search engine, etc. From such forums I used to get some stock idea and then do detail research on it. My habit is to do detail research and gather as much information possible on a company before investing in it. In the process I felt that the research which I am doing has to benefit all rather than only myself and so I started making detailed reports which even a layman can understand rgdg. the company which I invest in, to first check myself whether I am on right track or not and if I feel that I am right then to publish it for the benefit of all who don't have skills and resources to procure such analysis. Another reason of posting such report on various forums is that there might be something rgdg. a company which might have missed my attention can be brought to my attention via replies to my post. Also, reason for posting to multiple forums is that I can cover as much investors and analysts as possible so that I can get as much diverse views as possible so that I can reconfirm myself whether I am right or not. While doing so all the readers of my reports benefit from the detailed analysis I do and vast information I provide rgdg. the company and my main purpose of providing such detailed analysis and vast information is that  the reader can understand the company from each and every angle so that any corner doesn't remain untouched.

Now, Mr. Stockboy's comment rgdg. the reports published on behest of someone and the proof of such assumption is my mentioning of equity dilution rgdg. both the companies and that also specifically rgdg. Simran Farms with such tiny equity and minimal debt, Mr. Stockboy should very well understand that if a company has to grow, it needs to invest money and once a reasonable scale is achieved by a company (as is achieved by Simran Farms), to grow from such scale it requires a lot of money as otherwise it will sink into its own growth. Also, Mr. Stockboy should understand the art of financial projections wherein you need to incorporate every logical possiblity whether it actualy happens or not. Equity dilution is a logical possibility in case of both Simran and Riddhi because Simran needs to grow from a scale which it has not seen in its history while Riddhi needs to become an international player to reckon with in cornstarch industry as also become asia's largest cornstarch player in addition to retaining its industry leadership position in India. Hence, my these many years of experience of analysing various companies and my capability of anticipating logical moves of the respective management compels me to arrive at financial projections only after incorporating logical possibility of equity dilution. If this fact, written in good faith for benefit of all, is interpreted in such a way to suspect my integrity then I am sorry to say but it is as if a guy who does not understand a subject atall is giving lecture regarding that subject and also arriving at his own conclusions regarding an ununderstood subject.

With due respect to you Mr. basantji, altrhough I agree to the fact that TED is a great forum and is one of the best forums I have visited so far and you guys are doing great work here, but still, I must mention here one thing that you started your reply to Mr. Stockboy thanking him for his comments and then demanding the links and all but I wonder whether you have put your thought on the detailed analysis I have made and the pain and effort I must have spent to make such a report and publish it to forums for the benefit of all. Anyway still I can understand your concern and your legitimate vision of not allowing TED to get misused by someone but still you should have avoided Thanking him for his allegations-filled comment as it implies that you are agreeing to him. You should have demanded explanation which without you demanding I am providing not because I want to continue posting on TED but because I am strictly against false allegations. This is the reason why I am posting such detailed reply.

Also one important thing needs to be mentioned here. If you go through my various replies, in one reply I have clearly mentioned that we need to revisit Simran Farms after declaration of their Q1 numbers and also I have mentioned that Simran is a high-risk-high-gain stock while Riddhi is a low-risk-high-gain stock. Although in my portfolio both the companies occupy almost same percentage but still in my reply I posted this fact that one company is more riskier than other because Riddhi is an industry-leader and probability of losing money in the long run in an industry leader is remote than that in an industry player. If I would have had vested interest or was doing on behest of someone would I have commented like this way ?

To conclude, I have published my reports with all genuinity and someone deserves the right to counter my argument of the report but no one deserves the right to question my integrity. If publishing detailed analysis regarding a company and providing as much information as possible regarding a company is my fault then I am proud on my such deed.

Awaiting reply from you Mr. Basantji.

Rgds.

Mahesh