Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Equity Valuation Techniques
 The Equity Desk Forum :Market Strategies :Equity Valuation Techniques
Message Icon Topic: Free Cash flow. Is this the only thing? Post Reply Post New Topic
Page  of 9 Next >>
Author Message
PrashantS
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 14/Oct/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1294
Quote PrashantS Replybullet Topic: Free Cash flow. Is this the only thing?
    Posted: 20/Nov/2007 at 10:56pm
Originally posted by basant

Negative cash flow from operations: I am quietly sitting on a 85 bagger in Pantaloon (rights/split adjusted) with negative operating cash flow since the time I bought it in early 2003!
 
 
That is so nice to hear Basantji...it is some achievement ....I dont know how many people I know have done that....more than the money more than being right you did sit  tight  ...Bravo


Edited by basant - 20/Nov/2007 at 11:18pm
IP IP Logged
kaushalchawla
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/Sep/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 348
Quote kaushalchawla Replybullet Posted: 20/Nov/2007 at 11:05pm
Originally posted by basant

Negative cash flow from operations: I am quietly sitting on a 85 bagger in Pantaloon (rights/aplitadjusted) with negative operating cash flow since the time I bought it in early 2003!
 
I think "Cash Flow" factor should be looked at when the company/sector has matured and stable.
 
A growing company will always need lot of money for capex etc and hence cash flow will not give the correct picture.
 
Please correct me if i am wrong.
Warm Regards,
Kaushal
IP IP Logged
italics
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Aug/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Quote italics Replybullet Posted: 20/Nov/2007 at 11:11pm
Basantji, this is something that has confused me time and time again. Just about every expert/guru seems to stress the importance of free cash flow. In fact the classical defination of intrinsic value is also based around free cash flow. And no less a person than prof. mankekar has said that the intrinsic value of a company is determined by it's cash flow.
 
Yet on the other hand, time and time again i see many fold multibaggers come from company's that are cash flow negative for long periods - PRIL is a great example. I'm sure so was Bharti when it started out and countless other young growing companies.
 
So please tell of what significance is cash flow? And what is the right perspectiive to look at it? Because there seems to be a huge contradiction in terms of what we learn, and what actually happens in the market.
 
It would be great if you could give us your thoughts on cash flow and end this huge confusion in my mind once and for all Confused
 
I would really like to know how you view cash flow and how much importance you place on it.
 
Thanks
IP IP Logged
basant
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Quote basant Replybullet Posted: 20/Nov/2007 at 11:12pm
Originally posted by kaushalchawla

Originally posted by basant

Negative cash flow from operations: I am quietly sitting on a 85 bagger in Pantaloon (rights/aplitadjusted) with negative operating cash flow since the time I bought it in early 2003!
 
I think "Cash Flow" factor should be looked at when the company/sector has matured and stable.
 
A growing company will always need lot of money for capex etc and hence cash flow will not give the correct picture.
 
Please correct me if i am wrong.
 
Absolutely. It is like saying that you would not buy companies that do not pay dividends and that means you would have missed Bharti because it has never paid dividends.
 
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
IP IP Logged
italics
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Aug/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Quote italics Replybullet Posted: 21/Nov/2007 at 3:07pm
So of what use is cash flow?
 
When and why should it be used? basantji do you view and use cash flow at all, is it a consideration at all for you and if so how imp?
 
Thanks   
IP IP Logged
basant
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Quote basant Replybullet Posted: 21/Nov/2007 at 4:19pm

I look at sustainable RoE and RoCE which in one way saves you into high capex busienss or free cash flow. Generally low RoE companies have all problems relating to cash flows etc.

Personally I do not like capex intensive companies. Now if I own XYZ  and XYZ is growing at 30% with a RoE of 30% and has negative cash flow because it is investing and dilutes equity and raises debt but the RoE over the next 6 months increases back to 30% then I have no problems looking at the negative cash flow.
 
Generally as I said before high capex companies (low free cash flow) will have low RoEs over a longer period of time.
 
 


Edited by basant - 21/Nov/2007 at 9:52pm
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
IP IP Logged
Vivek Sukhani
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23/Jul/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6675
Quote Vivek Sukhani Replybullet Posted: 21/Nov/2007 at 5:50pm

Free cash flows are quite quite important. And i am not talking about market prices at all......prices go up for various reasons and sometimes a company whose office is in no-one's knowledge also shoot upwards. Now coming to the moot point why cash flows are important is that, thats what add up to the worth, be it reserves or dividend.

IP IP Logged
italics
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15/Aug/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Quote italics Replybullet Posted: 21/Nov/2007 at 9:01pm
Hi vivek, my question was more from the aspect of how cash flow is used to judge a company's intrinsic value. Obviously for young, growing comanies the yardstick is different as basantji has illustrated.
 
If company's that are cash flow negative for years on end can still prove to be very profitable investments, then obviously using cash as a yardstick in these companies would be wrong.
 
It's just that in theory cash flow is always said to be an important yartdstick for measuring a company's value but in practise it is not so cut and dried. So i was trying to understand what is the relationship of Cashflow to comp value in the real world.  
 
IP IP Logged
Page  of 9 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.016 seconds.
Bookmark this Page