Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Fundamental
 The Equity Desk Forum :Market Strategies :Fundamental
Message Icon Topic: Bubbles Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 6 Next >>
Author Message
Hitesh Shah
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12/Oct/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3656
Quote Hitesh Shah Replybullet Posted: 16/Aug/2009 at 11:05pm
This what I got from the NSE site:

Sr. No. Name of the issue LTP (Rs) Issue Price (Rs.) Date of Listing
1 Precision Pipes and Profiles Company Limited 49.45 150 01/11/08
2 PORWAL AUTO COMPONENTS LIMITED - 75 *
3 MANAKSIA LIMITED 46.95 160 01/08/08
4 ARIES AGRO LIMITED 55.15 130 01/11/08
5 BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LIMITED 94 390 12/31/07
6 Transformers And Rectifiers (India) Limited 279.65 465 12/28/07
7 BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED 368.75 480 01/03/08
8 ECLERX SERVICES LIMITED 326.4 315 12/31/07
9 JYOTHY LABORATORIES LIMITED 119.05 690 12/19/07
10 KAUSHALYA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED 21.05 60 12/14/07

For jyothy Labs, figure in a change in the face value.

Edelweiss is 13th and Mundra Port figures as 14th according to NSE.



Edited by Hitesh Shah - 16/Aug/2009 at 11:07pm
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 16/Aug/2009 at 11:56pm
Hitesh, thanks for making various corrections.
 
Man!! this list looks really sad....but expected i guess.
 
History does not repeat in the market....but i guess there's no harm in reemphasizing lessons once in a while
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 27/Aug/2009 at 2:53pm
Buffet articles just prior to the dot com bubble collapse..
(culled from Hitesh's link on another thread)
 
 
IP IP Logged
valuepicks
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/Mar/2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 180
Quote valuepicks Replybullet Posted: 27/Aug/2009 at 3:29pm
If we can say cyclical bull market started in 1992, post liberalization, by this year in 2009, we completed 17 years. Did we complete one cycle in buffet's observation of marathon trends? Smile
 
Originally posted by subu76

Buffet articles just prior to the dot com bubble collapse..
(culled from Hitesh's link on another thread)
 
 
IP IP Logged
chimak10
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30/Aug/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1540
Quote chimak10 Replybullet Posted: 27/Aug/2009 at 3:34pm
I like bubbles!!!!
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 27/Aug/2009 at 3:34pm
He He.....Nobody except Bejan daruwala knows it...we know it only in hindsight Smile
 
IP IP Logged
Monkey
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21/Aug/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 770
Quote Monkey Replybullet Posted: 27/Aug/2009 at 10:13pm
Well, I agree that this all is just guess work. But, here is my take.
 
We had our first secular bull market from 1979 to 1992. During this time period sensex rose from 100 in 1979 to 4500 in 1992. (45 times in 13 years, that too for Index!!)
 
After this 13 years of secular bull market, we expereince secular bear market from 1992 to 2003. During this 11 years of bear market, sensex went from 4500 to 3000 at bottom in April 2003.
 
From 2003 onwards, we are on to next secular bull market. If you ask Eliot wave theories, this second bull market will be stronger and longer than first bull market.
 
If so, this bull market will last much more than 13 years which would take us the time frame of 2016 to 2019 for the peak of this secular bull market.
 
Also, if this bull market is stronger than last one, return should be more that 45 times which wa achieved last time. Take a number of 70 times and with starting point of 3000, it gives us sensex number of 2,10,000 (Two lacs ten thousand)
 
Well, as I said, all this is guess work only. Hence, please do not feel offended.
 
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 16/Sep/2009 at 12:07pm
Scott McNealy, co-founder of Sun trashing his own company's dot com era prices in a 2002 interview.... Link
 
But two years ago we were selling at 10 times revenues when we were at $64. At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer company. That assumes zero expenses, which is really hard with 39,000 employees. That assumes I pay no taxes, which is very hard. And that assumes you pay no taxes on your dividends, which is kind of illegal. And that assumes with zero R&D for the next 10 years, I can maintain the current revenue run rate. Now, having done that, would any of you like to buy my stock at $64? Do you realize how ridiculous those basic assumptions are? You don't need any transparency. You don't need any footnotes. What were you thinking?
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 6 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.016 seconds.
Bookmark this Page